This week, Joe Biden called
on Congress to give all student borrowers $10,000 in debt relief on their
federal student loans. "It should be done immediately," Biden said.
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Charles Schumer say Mr. Biden's plan
is not bold enough. They want him to use his executive powers to give all
student borrowers $50,000 in debt relief. Senator Schumer said that
relief of that magnitude would wipe out all federal student-loan debt for 75
percent of college borrowers and provide at least partial relief for 95
percent.
So--is Biden's proposal too little or too much?
As I have said for years, a flawed relief plan is better than no
relief plan. I support any congressional or presidential action that would
grant some relief to the nation's 45 million student-loan debtors, who
collectively owe $1.7 trillion in college loans. If $10,000 in debt relief is
the only arrow in Mr. Biden's quiver, I say he should let it fly.
But both the Biden plan and the Warren-Schumer proposal are
flawed. First of all, a $10,000 write-off of each individual's student debt
will do almost nothing for the nearly 9 million borrowers in income-based
repayment plans. Their debt grows larger by the day because the loan payments
aren't large enough to pay off the accruing interest.
Moreover, Mr. Biden wants Congress to approve the deal, which will
take weeks, if not months. After all, the student-loan catastrophe is a
political hot potato that Congress might not want to pick up.
The Warren-Schumer proposal is far more comprehensive than
Biden's. As Senator Schumer said, this would eliminate all (federal)
student-loan debt for most Americans. But Warren and Schumer want Biden to take
this action on his own hook. Does he have the authority to forgiveness
$50,000 in student loans for millions of debtors?
Who knows? Ultimately, a federal court would have to rule on
that question.
As Senator Schumer averred, a $50,000 Christmas present would
relieve most recent college graduates of all their federal student-loan
obligations. For those folks, their college degree would turn out to be
free--or almost free. That would make many young Americans very happy, and most
of those who bothered to vote cast their ballots for Joe Biden.
But there are moral hazards to the Warren-Biden scheme that are
not inconsequential. I think it is a mistake to allow college graduates
to walk away from their student loans while doing nothing to force the universities
to bring their costs down.
Giving a few million Americans a get-out-of-jail-free card on
their student loans will only encourage the universities to continue charging
too much for a college degree and perhaps even tempt them to raise prices further.
What do tuition costs matter if the government is going to step
in from time to time and give students a free ride on their loans?
And once the feds step in once with a $50,000 bailout, students
will get it into their heads that they will do it again. So why worry about those
student loans? How will kids pay the rent on their luxury student housing?
No. It would be much better for Congress to pass legislation--with the next President's support--that would give distressed debtors easier access to the bankruptcy courts. Let the bankruptcy judges sort out who is really broke and deserves debt relief.
Regardless of what Congress or the next president does, the
student-loan scandal will not be fixed overnight. It is the huge friggin' elephant in the room that has blighted millions of Americans' lives.
But I think it would be a mistake for our national leaders to wipe
out perhaps a trillion dollars of student debt and leave the taxpayers stuck
with the bill.
Americans have grown skeptical about the value of a college
experience at universities mired in sexual-assault scandals (Penn State, UCLA,
Baylor, Michigan State, LSU, etc.). They wonder why our elite schools harbor so
many blowhard professors who teach students nothing more than most of them are
victims of societal bigotry.
Ain't there at least some good things about American society--its
culture, literature, democratic values, respect for human rights--some American
virtues worth studying and nurturing?
If not--if America is in the toilet and worthy of nothing but
contempt, why must students spend four or five years in college and borrow
$50,000 or $60,000 to get a bachelor's degree in cynicism? Didn't they learn to
be cynics in high school?
No comments:
Post a Comment