The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines snafu as "a situation marked by errors or confusion." The word is an acronym for "Situation Normal, All Fouled (or Fucked) Up."
Earlier this month, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a report confirming what we already knew: the federal student program is all f-cked up. The CFPB's publication is titled Supervisory Highlights Student Loan Servicing Special Edition, which doesn't tell you a damn thing about what's in the report. Perhaps that was intentional.
Although the bureaucratic writing style is turgid. The report makes clear that the federal student loan program is spectacularly mismanaged.
Here are some highlights:
The CFPB found that many colleges and universities refuse to release academic transcripts to students who are indebted to their institution. This practice often makes it impossible for former students to transfer to another school or get a job. The CFPB believes this practice is "abusive under the Consumer Financial Protection Act." Duh!
Second, CFPB criticizes student-loan servicers for bungling the administration of income-based repayment plans. Many borrowers in IBRPs are kicked out of these programs because they failed to certify their annual income annually. Those borrowers are then required to get recertified.
CFPB accused student-loan servicers of improperly denying borrowers' applications to get reinstated in an IBRP. "Examiners found that servicers engaged in a deceptive act or practice by providing consumers with a misleading denial reason after they submitted an IDR recertification application."
For example, servicers sometimes don't tell borrowers they must certify their income when they were not in an IBRP. Then they refuse to reinstate those borrowers because they didn't provide their income information.
CFPB also accused servicers of giving parent borrowers inaccurate information about their eligibility for an IBRPeligibility.
In short, the CFPB scolded for-profit colleges for withholding academic transcripts and student-loan services for spectacular mismanagement of income-based repayment plans.
Tellingly, the CFPB did not identify a single malefactor or suggest even one substantive action to correct the problems it identified. Instead, it ended its report with this pathetic and syntax-tangled sentence:
Regardless, where the Bureau identifies violations of Federal consumer financial law, it intends to continue to exercise all of its authorities to ensure that servicers and loan holders make consumers whole.
How reassuring!
Why didn't the CFPB propose that Congress pass a law that would make it illegal for a college to withhold academic transcripts from students, regardless of the reason?
Why didn't the CFPB call for the Department of Education to collaborate with the Internal Revenue Service to determine the annual income of students in IBRPs? It makes no sense for loan servicers to keep borrowers out of IBRPs because they didn't certify their income when the government can quickly determine annual income by looking at borrowers' annual federal income tax returns.
For some reason, the Department of Education and the CFPB would rather keep the student loan program in a snafu condition than take reasonable steps to make it operate more efficiently.
I much rather the CFPB "NOT identify a single malefactor or suggest even one substantive action to correct the problems it identified." That is someone else's problem; and for CFPB to go beyond pure analysis means providing something to hammer it over the head with later. Better NOT to take a position when the nature of the problem is so unclear, and there really is NO solution in sight. Kudos to CFPB for pure analysis -- initiated by whom? -- now it is up to the US Congress to act.
ReplyDeleteYou make a good point. Still, Americans need to know which student-loan servicers are mismanaging their loan portfolios. They need to feel the heat.
ReplyDelete