Our Madmen Assassins: Their Political Ideologies May Not Matter

Over the course of a few weeks, assassins with murky motives have murdered strangers with guns.  Robin Westman, an 18-year-old, shot up a Catholic mass in Minneapolis, killing two children and wounding 18 more. Tyler Robinson, age 22, allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk, a young, conservative Christian spokesperson, while he was speaking on a Utah college campus. Then, more recently. Joshua Jahn, twenty-nine years old, shot into a Dallas ICE facility, killing a Hispanic detainee and wounding two others.

Two of the assassins--Robinson and Jahn-- shot themselves at their killing sites. Tyler Robinson, the man who reportedly killed Kirk, was captured alive.

Politicians and the legacy media have attempted to identify the political ideologies of these murderers. Some commentators blame right-wing politics for the violence, while others argue that political violence is most often associated with leftist ideologies.

I don't think the political leanings of these madmen explain their violent actions or are even relevant. They're all nuts. 

Without exception, the killers are young men suffering from mental illness, although a few identify as women. They are isolated, lonely guys who spend too much time playing video games, and most of them probably smoke too much marijuana. They don't have a girlfriend or romantic partner. None of these killers has a clear vocational identity or any hope of joining the workforce. None of them dream of owning a home, marrying, or raising a family.

 In short, all these sadsacks are losers, not in the perjorative sense but in the existential sense. These guys were never going anywhere in life, and they all know it. 

So, why not get a gun, preferably a semi-automatic assault rifle, and start killing people? By committing murder, at least they'll get their 15 minutes of fame, a brief burst of online notoriety.

Every time a school shooting or mass killing occurs, left-wingers call for gun control. But that horse has already left the barn. The United States has almost 400 million guns in circulation, more than one gun for every man, woman, and child. We will never get those firearms out of circulation, even if we had the political will to try.

And rifles and pistols are cheap. Even a guy working at McDonald's can afford an off-brand assault rifle. 

Our society is to blame for all this carnage. What kind of world have we created that has caused some men to invest in killing tools rather than marriage, a family, and a vocation?

Second Thoughts About the Death Penalty After Charlie Kirk's Assassination

Yesterday, my local newspaper ran a story about a 25-year-old man charged with raping a four-year-old girl. According to the news report, the man, who had a history of indecent behavior with juveniles, infected the child with chlamydia, a sexually transmitted disease.

What punishment is appropriate for such an offense?

A few months ago, a 45-year-old man shouting "Free Palestine" set Jewish Americans on fire in Boulder, Colorado. An 82-year-old woman died from her injuries. 

What is a just punishment for such a vicious, racially motivated hate crime?

Earlier this week, an assassin killed Charlie Kirk while he was speaking on a university campus in Utah. Kirk, a conservative political activist, was 31 years old with a wife and two small children.

A 22-year-old Tyler Robinson was arrested. If convicted, what should be done with him?

When I was a college student, I took a class in criminology, which included a field trip to the Oklahoma's maximum-security prison. The warden was our tour guide, and he appeared to take pleasure in showing students the prison's death chamber, where the electric chair was displayed. 

I recall the wooden chair was fitted with restraining straps and a metal cap with wires attached. It looked like a medieval torture device.

I also remember a viewing area where seated spectators could watch a prisoner being electrocuted. Over the chair was a large sign stating "Crime Doesn't Pay."

All the students were shocked by the scene. I, however, was overcome by nausea, physically sickened and frightened by what I saw.

From that moment until this week, I've been opposed to the death penalty. Gazing on the electric chair,  I was overcome by the brutality and ugliness of capital  punishment. I felt coursened by the sight of that chair and by the fact that I lived in a society that would kill a man in such a way.

This week, however, I re-examined my stance on capital punishment. I asked myself whether there are some crimes so heinous, so destructive to moral order, that the death penalty is the only appropriate punishment. Does society have the right and even the duty to signal its repugnance to certain violent acts by killing the perpetrator?

This morning, I was prepared to believe that a man who rapes a child deserves the death penalty as does a man who sets people on fire out of racial hatred. And I was certainly prepared to believe that the man who killed Charlie Kirk in cold blood should be executed.

But then I saw an image of  Tyler Robinson, the man who was arrested on the charge of murdering Charlie Kirk. So young, so confused, so obsessed with violence. 

If Robinson is convicted of this killing, he certainly deserves to die, and society has the moral right to execute him. Nevertheless, I hope the state of Utah doesn't inflict the death sentence because killing Tyler Robinson coursens us all.

Rather. I hope he is sentenced to a very long prison sentence, perhaps life in prison. After all. as Pope Francis observed, a life sentence is a death sentence, and that should satisfy society's sense of justice.