Why are they refusing to eat? Are they calling attention to the student loan crisis, which has destroyed the lives of millions? Are they calling for student-debt relief? Are they asking for student-loan debt forgiveness?
No, they are going on a hunger strike because they might get hungry! Well--that's not quite accurate. Actually, the strikers are protesting what they say is the university's inadequate response to students' food and housing insecurity.
These are the strikers specific demands as reported by a local newspaper:
1) They want UK to establish a Basic Needs Health Center "focused on helping students with housing and food-related challenges."
2) They want the University to establish a Basic Needs Fund, which would distribute small cash grants to students with food or housing issues.
3) Finally, the strikers want the university to hire a full-time person dedicated to helping students meet their food and housing needs.
UK's president, Eli Capilouto, roused his public relations staffers from their slumbers, and the PR team pumped out a suitably sensitive and vapid public response. Here is a sample:
"[W]hile we may disagree in some of our specific approaches [to hunger]," Capilouto purred sympathetically, "we will never disrespect the concerns that have been raised or those who have raised them." So--no tear gas or pepper spray. That's a relief! No one wants to get tear gassed on an empty stomach.
Capilouto went on to say that UK had cut the cost of its most popular meal plan and expanded the operating hours for the university food pantry. He also said the university was raising money for an emergency fund.
"These next steps are a beginning, not an end," Capilouto assured the strikers. "This is a journey we are on--as a campus community and as compassionate, caring citizens in a larger world." Don't you love that journey bullshit?
And then President Capilouto concluded his feeble statement with a flourish: "After all, we share the same goal--a commitment to making progress in ways that ensure the health and wellness of our students as we prepare them for lives of meaning and purpose."
Wow! I give President Capilouto and his PR hacks an A minus for producing a hunger-strike response that is as flavorless and boring as the ramen noodles his students are eating. (I deducted a few points from his grade because he didn't include the words "transparent" and "inclusive.")
I don't mean to make light of food insecurity on college campuses. In spite of the fact that students borrow on average about $37,000 to get their college degrees, they sometimes fall short on grocery money. But isn't that what the UK food pantry is for?
Let's take a closer look at what the UK hunger strikers are demanding: "A Basic Needs Center focused on helping students with housing and "food-related challenges." But UK has a student-housing staff and people in charge of the campus dining halls. That's not enough?
And the strikers want small financials grants--apparently to meet food and housing emergencies. But isn't that what the federal student loan program is designed for? And part-time jobs, for that matter.
But the strikers' last demand is truly ludicrous. The strikers, delusional perhaps due to lack of protein, want UK to hire ANOTHER ADMINISTRATOR who will be dedicated to "addressing students' food and housing needs."
I'm sure UK will be happy to comply. Heck, it might hire a half dozen new administrators to staff a Basic Needs Center. Sure it will cost money, but UK can always raise its tuition; and students will simply take out bigger student loans to absorb the cost.
Why do you suppose the UK protesters didn't call a hunger strike to protest the student-loan crisis and the outrageous cost of going to college? You know why. UK would probably turn the fire hoses on them.
And here's a footnote. President Capilouto--Mr. Sensitive--makes $790,000 a year. That will buy a lot of ramen noodles.
|President Capilouto--Mr. Sensitive--makes $790,000 per year.|